Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 7781 - 7800 of 11,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2009, 4:18 pm
  Pursuant to California Rule of Court 8.548, the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit requested that the California Supreme Court decide whether a plaintiff seeking damages under Civ. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:22 am by Josh H. Escovedo
  15 U.S.C. section 1127; Rust Env’t & Infrastructure, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm by Ben Sperry
United States could have an impact on statutory construction going forward. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:37 pm by Lara
“G.A.P Adventures shall have until September 1, 2011, to transition to a new name in the United States,” the June 24, 2011 federal court order states. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
In Windsor, the Supreme Court struck down DOMA’s prohibition of the recognition of same-sex couples as married or spouses as an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:55 am by Stefanie Levine
Written by Gene Quinn (of IPWatchdog and Practice Center Contributor) Last week the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling in Goeddel v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:50 am
Morel (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Google – Google asks California judge to declare that it is not liable for copyright infringement, simply by linking to copyright-infringing works on RapidShare (1709 Copyright Blog) Universal Music Group – Amici urge 9th Circuit to reverse UMG v Veoh case; RIAA, NBCU, PROs and WLF weigh in (Copyrights & Campaigns)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court E D Virginia… [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer… [read post]
24 May 2014, 10:23 am by Betsy McKenzie
The United States is very unlikely to come up with any similar ruling, largely because of our First Amendment free speech legal tradition. [read post]