Search for: "House v. House"
Results 7781 - 7800
of 41,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
Phillips v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:30 am
Circuit decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 7:40 am
Skinner v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Complete Auto Remains the Rule, As Modified by Wayfair The South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
That's Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 5:18 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
Nevertheless, the “single meaning” rule has been well established in the law for two hundred years and was endorsed by the House of Lords in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:33 am
London Borough of Hamlets v Al Ahmed (2019) EWHC 749 (QB) Mr Ahmed had applied to Tower Hamlets (oddly named as ‘Hamlets’ in the reported judgment) as homeless. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 12:10 pm
Suffice it to say at this juncture that the law is settled in this area: the Supreme Court having reconsidered the requirement that all tenancies must be for a term certain, and giving the rule renewed (if, it must be said, grudging) approval in Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd v Berrisford(2012) 1 AC 955. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 12:14 pm
Combs v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 7:07 am
REASONS TO SEPARATE:(a) If you are having health/medical problems, and you are on your spouse's health insurance plan, then this might be a good reason to simply file a separate maintenance action, so you won't lose health insurance coverage; and(b) If you don't want to have to sell your house right now, because, for example, you want your child to have time to graduate from a particular school, or because the housing market is so lousy in your area at the present… [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:19 am
Astonishingly, or perhaps just boldly, though, he went on to criticise the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Berrisford, having been given some suasion by Southward Housing Co-Operative v Walker [2016] Ch 443 (our note). [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 10:09 am
38/41 CHG Residents Company Limited v Hyslop (LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES) (2020) UKUT 21 (LC) A quick note on a Upper Tribunal (LC) appeal concerning whether services charge demands had been delivered. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 3:48 pm
by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 10:09 am
38/41 CHG Residents Company Limited v Hyslop (LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES) (2020) UKUT 21 (LC) A quick note on a Upper Tribunal (LC) appeal concerning whether services charge demands had been delivered. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 1:38 pm
Mehta in Nunes v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 4:44 am
I’ve been thinking about the 1968 Supreme Court case of Hunter v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 6:29 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley, et al v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:41 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley, et al v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
