Search for: "*doe, Matter of" Results 7821 - 7840 of 140,221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2012, 4:08 pm
The unevenness of the sidewalk was found to be only a trivial matter and does not hold the defendants liable for damages. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Jenny Maddocks
Although the ICTY was competent to rule only on matters of individual criminal responsibility, not State responsibility, it asserted that the lower threshold of “overall control” should also apply for the purposes of attribution. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 12:05 am
But, since you may not have any real leverage, you need to work on being diplomatic and conciliatory, no matter how hard that may be for you. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:23 am
Corporate law does not only matter in the last respect; it matters in both. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Rio School District, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Apr. 1, 2015), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Six) reminded us that the doctrine of unclean hands does not apply to UCL claims, equitable though they may be:  Not only is there no analogous case applying the [unclean hands] doctrine to an action pursuant to [Public Contract Code] section 7107, there are analogous cases holding as a matter of law that the doctrine does not apply to such statutory… [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 3:25 am by SHG
But in a small, elite liberal arts school like Wellesley, does any of that matter? [read post]
5 Nov 2005, 11:01 am
"When a revocation does not revoke. [read post]
21 May 2016, 4:28 am by SHG
Second, the field is so grossly unlevel that no matter what the defense does, it can’t touch the advantage the prosecution enjoys. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 5:02 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Where does this case leave the First Amendment? [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 3:10 pm
Vopper, the Supreme Court case that said "a stranger's illegal conduct does not suffice to remove the First Amendment shield from speech about a matter of public concern." [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:55 am
The Board disagreed, but in any case observed that applicant's mark "merely describe[s] the nineteen crimes themselves under the broadly stated subject matter of Applicant's goods and services. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:29 am
It does not matter what you want or they want - what does your child want and need? [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 5:51 pm
If the presumption of advancement continues to apply to matters under Part 5 of the FLA, does section 95 of the FLA provide sufficient flexibility to allow a Court to address any alleged unfairness caused by excluded property being converted to family property? [read post]