Search for: "People v Goode" Results 7821 - 7840 of 22,582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2017, 6:27 am
The reverse occurred last summer when the EU's General Court held that the word NEUSCHWANSTEIN (the name of Ludwig II's fantasy castle in Bavaria) was inherently distinctive for merchandising goods throughout the EU (and so also in Germany), despite the fact that four years earlier the Bundesgerichtshof had held that, for German people, it emphatically was not. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
VC Laster’s Transcript Ruling in Gerlanc v Beatrice A recent transcript ruling by Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery in Gerlanc v Beatrice, CA No. 2017-0211-JTL (Mar. 23, 2017), reaches the opposite result on similar facts due to key differences in Delaware’s LLC Act. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
VC Laster’s Transcript Ruling in Gerlanc v Beatrice A recent transcript ruling by Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery in Gerlanc v Beatrice, CA No. 2017-0211-JTL (Mar. 23, 2017), reaches the opposite result on similar facts due to key differences in Delaware’s LLC Act. [read post]
21 May 2017, 7:09 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Removal of office for a judge is rare, and that’s probably a good thing. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
We regulate bad speech only at the peril of the good. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
We regulate bad speech only at the peril of the good. [read post]
19 May 2017, 8:00 am by Josh Blackman
And there is a good reason for this bifurcation of precedents. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:25 am by Terry Hart
People may be consuming more content than ever, but most creators aren’t reaping the gains. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:47 am by James Kachmar
The Court began by recognizing that generic terms are “common descriptive” names, which people use to describe a particular type of good or services. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:47 am by James Kachmar
The Court began by recognizing that generic terms are “common descriptive” names, which people use to describe a particular type of good or services. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:30 pm by Christopher Walker
Supreme Court recognized in Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 5:41 pm by Robert Chesney
 All lawyers in the U.S. will recall the writ of mandamus from good ol' Marbury v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 12:23 pm by Rachel Tarko Hudson
Any people appearing in the work have rights to their image under privacy laws. [read post]
17 May 2017, 12:23 pm by Rachel Tarko Hudson
Any people appearing in the work have rights to their image under privacy laws. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Binderup, 16-847, involves two people, Daniel Binderup and co-respondent Julio Suarez, who were separately convicted of strangely classified crimes: misdemeanors punishable by up to a two-year sentence in prison (sex with an underage person and drunken driving, respectively). [read post]
17 May 2017, 4:37 am by Eugene Volokh
For that reason, the Supreme Court upheld a federal law forbidding people from sending certain material to others once the recipients have told senders to stop, reasoning that “[N]o one has a right to press even ‘good’ ideas on an unwilling recipient. [read post]