Search for: "Price v. Price" Results 7821 - 7840 of 18,095
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2021, 7:23 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case asks whether you can sue the medical provider for charging more than 75 cents.The case is Ortiz v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:54 am by Jeff Gamso
Read Judge Scheindlin's opinion in the Stop and Frisk case, Floyd v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
South is of course far larger and more wide-ranging than just the direct legacy of Brown v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Thus, said the court, SDHR did not err by adopting the total offset method to determine the value of Seabury's lost pension benefits and confirmed its determination. * See Executive Law §298.** Matter of Rensselaer County Sheriff's Dept. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 131 AD3d 777.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_05719.htm [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:27 am
The other, by Kimala Price, is "Women of color want reproductive justice, not just abortion rights. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:10 am
This Kat has also posted an item there on British Gas v VanClare, an instructive extempore decision of Arnold J on whether and when bifurcation is possible in England and Wales. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:25 pm
-->-->*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->BY MARC BOURGEOISAntonio FrankoWednesday's first witness was Antonio Franko, a high school friend of Joels. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:14 am by Colby Pastre
They are certainly superior to hitting current retirees with frozen COLAs,[v] or freezing initial benefit growth for new retirees with no warning. [read post]