Search for: "Brown v. State" Results 7841 - 7860 of 8,750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm by John Dean
” Following this line of reasoning, the High Court later stated in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am by John Dean
” Following this line of reasoning, the High Court later stated in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” Likewise, Justice Thomas filed an originalist dissent from Justice Scalia’s majority opinion invalidating a state law requiring parental consent for minors to purchase violent video games in Brown v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  After this, the Ninth Circuit quickly lifted its stay on Judge Walker’s order, and Governor Jerry Brown and Attorney General Kamala Harris instructed all county clerks to ignore Proposition 8 and issue same-sex marriage licenses. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In this regard, it bears noting that some of the Supreme Court’s most celebrated (and legally correct) decisions (such as Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:25 am by Adam Klasfeld
A close reading of the lead opinion, concurrences, and dissents in Trump v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:25 am by Peter J. Sluka
Most importantly, Delaware law reverses the burden of proof: the “burden is on the fiduciary to show that he or she did not seize a corporate opportunity” (Grove v Brown, CV 6793-VCG [Del Ch Aug. 8, 2013]). [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
This is in line with one of the “limiting principles” in the law of breach of confidence, as stated in the Spycatcher litigation (Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 HL) that the law would not protect the trivial or the anodyne. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 9:17 am by Giles Peaker
They fulfil the tenant condition because at the relevant time they are the tenant and continue to occupy the dwelling-house as their only or principal home in the extended sense which has been understood in the case law since Brown v Brash and Ambrose, in 1948, if not before. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
In Cadwalladr, the Court of Appeal also confirmed that “publication” for the purposes of section 1(1) (and indeed, the 2013 Act as a whole unless otherwise stated) continued to have its common law meaning – a communication of the statement to someone other than the claimant – and that each single communication is a separate and actionable tort. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Xenophobes cannot admit that they oppose immigration because they think brown people are dirty. [read post]