Search for: "Price v. Price"
Results 7861 - 7880
of 18,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2012, 8:09 pm
When the borrower defaulted the lender sold the property as mortgagee in possession by public auction in February 2010 for the sale price of $980,000. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
However, a new challenge to BKA emerged earlier this year with the filing of Tichy v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:00 am
Supreme Court's decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:21 am
Ontario’s power pricing system is already badly mangled, as we vacillate between insisting on pricing power through the open market, and using it to achieve social goals. [read post]
6 May 2008, 10:06 am
* Jazz Photo v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 3:30 am
Parties seeking to avoid the rigors of the SEC’s disclosure regime may succeed in having that regime diluted and subject to expanded exceptions, making share prices less accurate and eroding the efficiency of the pricing of capital and distorting the manner in which U.S. firms are operated. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:20 am
In reality, the price obtained from the sale of a single property was used to facilitate the release of security for all five properties as no sales had been agreed for the other four. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 2:43 pm
The New York Court of Appeals’ October 27, 2016 opinion in Justinian Capital SPC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:35 am
(MCL 500.3107(1)(a)) With those rules in mind, in Bronson Methodist Hospital v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 6:44 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada rendered it judgment in Cowper-Smith v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 7:47 pm
Mehta v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 2:42 pm
Thanks to Paul Caron, I came across Perez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:14 pm
Soni v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 2:35 am
In DeCook v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
” Branche v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 3:41 pm
Vons Cos. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Such knowledge that has not been publicly disclosed is highly valuable price-sensitive information that may be exploited by the issuer’s management and other insiders for financial benefit.[9] In its key phases, a buyback program involves material non-public information, including (a) the size, form, duration, and impact on the issuer’s financial position of the buyback program, (b) the transaction prices and the rate of reduction in the issuer’s capital; and (c)… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
Varjabedian, which asked whether securities investors can sue a company for negligently failing to provide adequate information for the investors to use in evaluating the price of a tender offer. [read post]
