Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 7901 - 7920 of 8,263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by Lawrence Solum
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:58 pm by Jennifer S. Bard
For example, Justice Souter quite clearly stated that one of the reasons leading him to resign was because he did not like living in Washington, D.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 7:55 am
Celebrating the 'Kelo' House Legal Times Three years ago next week, the Supreme Court issued one of its most controversial decisions so far this century: Kelo v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm by Howard Knopf
Why is this shaping up to be a battle between scholarly and other individual authors. ranging from the most obscure to J. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
Legal Times Oral argument in the whistleblower case of Allison Engine Company v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm by Roy Black
The plaintiff in a personal injury case, the CEO in an acquisition battle, the husband or wife in a divorce action, a former employee is a sex harassment suit, or a co-conspirator who has made a deal to testify. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:46 am by Lara
  Related Posts: Sweet & Nasty: False Advertising Suit over HFCS Grows Increasingly Sour Sugar v Corn Syrup: Bitter False Advertising Battle Plays Out in the Press Navajo Nation Fights Urban Outfitters over Tacky Trademark Infringement Moving on to New Beginnings: A Trademark Attorney’s Journey to Find Solace at the PTO Sorry I was Gone So Long (& a Look at Sorry Trademarks) [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
We are in an on-going legal battle to fight this false charge andregain our dignity and the very modest "privileges" affo [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 6:11 am
That is probably as much due to the absence of any genuine guidance from the Supreme Court of Canada since 1990's Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:39 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
This lack of a consistent common law on the issue leaves the bar and trial court judges with great uncertainty on the issue.The Initial PreferenceIt has been about five years since the automobile accident litigation landscape was changed by a 2005 state Supreme Court case, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
Amidst the celebration of cultural remixing and transformative use, a paradox also emerges: the challenge of hypocrisy when artists who engage in appropriation themselves become embroiled in legal battles over copyright infringement. [read post]