Search for: "Line v. State" Results 7901 - 7920 of 28,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2010, 8:34 am by ---------------------------------
The decisions also bring Ohio in line with a large majority of states that apply standards the same as or similar to those contained in R.C. 2745.01. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:14 pm by Linda McClain
Without embracing the equation made in Reynolds v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 3:23 am by SHG
And at the Supreme Court, during last week’s oral arguments in the travel ban case, Trump v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm by KC Johnson
For instance, the brief points to a 5thCircuit case, Hand v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:44 pm
"At some point we have to decide where to draw the line on something being politically right but morally wrong," he said. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
Disqualifying applicants for a particular job EEOC v Woodbridge Corp., CA8, 263 F.3d 812Mathews v The Denver Post, CA10, 2001 WL 967797 The Woodbridge and Mathews cases concern similar issues: disqualifying an individual with a disability for a particular job or assignment. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 10:08 am
On the other hand, given the way Risk handled coverage of the "sovereign immunity issue" in Sistrunk v United States of America I am not at all surprised. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am by Marty Lederman
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:11 pm by John Lewis
” Specifically, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, filed July 13, 2021, asserts that “upholding the Panel decision would needlessly create a circuit split on whether a class of workers must physically cross state lines to be ‘engaged in commerce’ under the FAA’s Section 1 . . . exemption,” citing Waithaka v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am by Adam Baker
ED refused on the basis of a stated practice not to sign letters of intent prior to the award of a prime contract. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm by Edward A. Fallone
If there is a silver lining in the ruling of Judge Davis, it is that he resisted the call of the plaintiffs to extend the holding of Bush v. [read post]