Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 20,282
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2019, 1:59 pm
(citing Maddalone v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:46 am
This left people with the option to set up residency in other states in order to qualify to file for divorce jurisdictionally, which takes 60-90 days and an intent to reside there indefinitely.Fortunately for these couples, the recent United States Supreme Court ruling Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 9:56 am
United States, involved the conflict between state abortion bans and the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), a federal law that requires life- and health-saving care, including abortion, in emergency departments. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 10:36 pm
Chessman (34 P. 2d 679 (1959) at page 699) and People V. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
As long as the policy was “pregnancy-blind,” it did not run afoul of the PDA. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:27 am
The NLRB did not apply the United States' Supreme Court's holding in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:25 pm
Hot on the heels of the fascinating testimony last week from Admiral McRaven and General Allen regarding disposition options for terrorism suspects captured overseas but outside Afghanistan, we learned today about a new case involving an overseas capture of a terrorist carried out by the U.S. military, followed by an extended period of no-Miranda interrogation, followed finally by civilian prosecution in the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:56 am
Griffith, Deceased v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 7:46 am
In King v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:42 am
The Court ruled 6-3 on March 25 in Young v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:43 pm
" Watson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
See Harisiades v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:36 pm
But, he also asked the United States Supreme Court to decide the NSA surveillance issue, citing a “looming gulf” between the facts in Smith v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:25 am
The "privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States," on the other hand, was an accepted term of art which referred to those rights conferred upon United States citizens by the Constitution itself. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:45 am
In Trump v. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 7:07 am
In the case 49 WB, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 7:07 am
In the case 49 WB, LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:19 pm
Under that Act, no one may discharge pollutants into “navigable waters,” defined as “the waters of the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
