Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 7921 - 7940 of 20,282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2006, 12:39 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKTaxationTax Preparer Claiming False 'Hope Credits' for Clients Is Enjoined From Preparing Individual Tax Returns United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:13 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
Mandel providing that the courts will not look behind the executive’s exercise of discretion to exclude aliens from the United States so long as the executive “exercises this power on the basis of a facially legitimate and bona fide reason. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
  In general, common law jurisdictions such as England & Wales, the United States of America, Canada and Australia have substantially greater guidance available, reflecting a well-developed practice of using surveys as evidence. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
So long as an illegal sentence is subject to correction, a defendant cannot claim a legitimate expectation that the originally-imposed, improper sentence is final for all purposes (see United States v Fogel, 829 F2d 77, 87 [DC Cir 1987])...Yet, there must be a temporal limitation on a court's ability to resentence a defendant (see generally DeWitt v Ventetoulo, 6 F3d at 34-35) since criminal courts do not have perpetual jurisdiction over all persons… [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
”  Molly also rounded up early coverage and commentary on yesterday’s four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sandy began complaining about the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States 20-326Issue: Whether the due process clause excuses the government’s knowing use of false testimony in a criminal prosecution so long as the government divulged evidence during discovery indicating that the testimony was false. [read post]