Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 7921 - 7940
of 43,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
Port v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:13 pm
AFCCA today issued a published opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Lipsey v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:42 pm
All of a sudden, you’d have the State of Connecticut, the defense, and the victim advocate all acting in cross-purposes maybe. [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:02 am
The record demonstrates that FFR was noncompliant with defendants' request for pro [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:35 pm
In Barrios v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:16 am
Further, said the court, even had the faculty member Article 78 action “been timely commenced, the record demonstrates that the [College President] substantially complied with the internal rules of Purchase College, State University of New York and the determination was not arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:12 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:40 am
The issue has also widened because the DOJ and the same state AGs as in the litigation that was originally started by Epic brought a motion for sanctions in the United States et al. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 9:20 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
On Monday, June 6, 2011, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Fox v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:33 am
(Orin Kerr) This morning the Supreme Court handed down Kentucky v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
Heller v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
“When an objection is made, specific grounds must be stated and other grounds not stated are waived on appeal… An objection to evidence on the grounds of prejudice or relevance cannot be raised for the first time on appeal” Akers v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:14 am
The Secretary of State was said to be at fault for not ensuring that proper records were kept. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
In this case, Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 2:53 am
The Court, in substantiating their stance, look to the Court of Appeals case People v. [read post]
