Search for: "State v. Fair"
Results 7941 - 7960
of 27,484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[18] Young v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) Read judgment As readers of this blog will know, control orders have often been successfully challenged in the courts on human rights grounds. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 2:00 am
The Seller relied on The Golden Victory (Golden Strait Corporation v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 3:58 pm
Another was in State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:58 am
However, not surprisingly, few fairs and petting zoos took the recommendations to heart and the outbreaks and illnesses continued. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 8:06 am
This week our lawsuit, Donaldson and Guggenheim v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:23 am
McPherson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
& Taylor Rest. v New York State Liq. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:32 am
Albrecht, which raises questions about whether a state-law failure-to-warn claim is pre-empted by federal law regulating the safety and efficacy of prescription drugs, and Obduskey v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:26 am
Alaina Wadsworth, Chris Horsefield and Ben Brown, who all work within the Insurance & Reinsurance Group at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court earlier this month, in the matter of Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13: Earlier this month, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in the matter of Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:41 am
" in Gall v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
Chevron deference has long been a prime target of conservative opponents of the “administrative state,” and they scored a big victory with the SCOTUS’s 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 3:57 am
Accardi v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:19 am
In the wake of the January 13 oral argument in American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 3:30 pm
Detroit Board of Education and Teachers v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 9:16 am
In this case (Loblaws Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
Code § 3553(c), a sentencing court must state `the reasons for its imposition of the particular sentence. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:29 am
Two years after the United States Supreme Court reversed the South Carolina Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
To be fair, at the cert. stage parties have only so many pages to devote to the merits, as distinguished from the cert-worthiness, of the dispute, but even by these standards the Reply brief is unimpressive.Never mind that the Reply brief never engages the historical understanding (that Akhil and I go through in detail) that state “legislatures” at the Founding were understood and defined to be entities limited by state constitutions and subject to judicial… [read post]
