Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 8,263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2007, 1:32 am
Danone v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
: (SpicyIP), Moving towards the nano age: (SpicyIP), YouTube (Google) and T-Series copyright dispute: (SpicyIP), (TechWhack), JapanIP Value in Japan - the alternative view: (IAM),South KoreaSouth Korea has been urged to strengthen its intellectual property rules in order to sign a free trade agreement with the European Union: (Intellectual Property Watch)The NetherlandsDutch teenager arrested, and another five questioned by police, for allegedly stealing virtual furniture from… [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 6:42 am
(That is not a reason to think that Brown was a mistake: it is simply a consequence of how judicial protection of controversial rights claims usually works in the United States.).Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:21 am
We've got a state appellate court. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:24 pm
The last big preemption case, Watters v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
House of Representatives voted to overturn the D.C. gun ban in 2004 and again in 2005.Then, last March, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia overturned the ban, giving gun rights advocates a major victory in their long battle over the restrictions.The ruling drew strong reaction from both sides of the gun control issue. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 9:36 am
And yesterday's trial court opinion continues this -- paragraph 73 cites Dague v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:58 am
A final note for blog readers-- The Battle in Beaumont was ultimately a dispute between two Washington State companies. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Following the holding in Seinfeld v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:16 pm
The first obligation of the president of the United States is to protect and defend the United States of America. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:50 am
The Supreme Court is expected to hear the case of Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 11:04 pm
Today's Supreme Court, certainly, has taken a step back, holding that government action to battle race-conscious social discrimination must be color-blind (see PICS v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 9:26 am
Jasperson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:17 am
Circuit's decision in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 8:33 am
Since Hurricane Katrina pummeled the Gulf Coast more than three years ago, plaintiffs â [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:50 pm
The case is Baraka v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
This industrial hemp lawsuit is Monson, et al. v. [read post]
