Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 7961 - 7980 of 8,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2016, 6:05 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the appeals court vacated the award and ordered a new trial since the district court erroneously allowed former administrators to provide lay opinion testimony in which they “nakedly” speculated that the mayor considered race in his appointments (Village of Freeport v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Tia Sewell
Superior Court Judge Shana Frost Matini rebuked Pack’s attacks against the OTF. [read post]
20 May 2015, 5:31 am
  Or was Lincoln right that the Constitution itself is of superior authority to the Supreme Court? [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:16 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
That is why, for example, even the historically exemption-resistant California Supreme Court in Harris v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
The standard used by the Commissioner in formulating his ruling:A superior may issue a letter critical of an individual’s performance and place a copy of such a letter in the individual’s personnel file without initiating disciplinary action pursuant to Section [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:24 pm
 On May 30, 2008, the appellate court issued its opinion in Cypress Semiconductor Corporation v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  This does push TM law to change too.McKenna: agrees that this was a change in marketing that courts were noticing.Litman: just doesn’t agree with the idea that TM law was “designed” to cut retailers out; maybe a wording issue.McGeveran: consumer v. producer orientation is really important. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
MooreFederal Appellate Court DecisionsPaul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here2nd Circuit Carras v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am by Schachtman
Judge Higbee has since ascended to the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:37 pm by Jennifer Granick
  Nevertheless, it fell out of favor with potential plaintiffs in 2003, when the California Supreme Court ruled in Intel v. [read post]