Search for: "Little v State"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 26,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2017, 10:48 pm
The Supreme Court declined to review a lower court ruling that the settlement was unfair to some retailers who stood to receive little or no benefit from the case. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am
” It is well established in cases from Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am
It would be easy to frame this issue in classic policy terms of government regulation v. the marketplace. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am
It would be easy to frame this issue in classic policy terms of government regulation v. the marketplace. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:05 am
A narrow ruling would dispose of this case but provide little guidance for pregnancy-counseling-regulation cases pending in the lower courts. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:46 pm
TetraTech v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
I see very little distinction — or any — between that and handing someone a piece of paper that says stock. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:44 am
This was a violation of state and local codes. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:44 am
This was a violation of state and local codes. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:08 am
The legal enforcement of Brown v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
There is some intuitive appeal to that suggestion, but it fades with a little more consideration. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:13 am
Studies have also shown that the majority of online sales are made through distributors' own websites, leading to very little detriment through the prohibition (although third-party sites are growing in importance). [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:14 pm
See Daly v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:54 pm
Coker v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:27 am
DOR, Appeal No. 2015AP2019, DWD v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 5:01 am
See Avakoff v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 4:59 am
The appeals court, in Wang v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 2:59 am
” [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Meggan DeWitt, Cato on Knick v. [read post]
