Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 14,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
The recent case of Ann Samolyk v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:47 pm
Nast v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
Florida filing latest in Motorola v Apple war Nothing warms patent lawyers' cockles during these freezing winter months than more mobile patent disputes. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
This gave rise to a strong inference that Asda understood and recognized that the wordless mark denoted Specsavers even with the words ‘ASDA Opticians’ emblazoned on top. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:05 am
They all, however, need to grapple with the same kinds of issues HavenCo did, and it’s interesting to see some of the different balances they’ve tried to strike.Artificial Islands and Seasteading: The nations of the world have signaled their strong disinterest in allowing the creation of new competitors on artificial islands. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
United States, Dean v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:00 pm
The Louisiana dispute, Ardoin v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 5:35 am
" Guice v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm
SEC reversed the burden of proof, stating that the plaintiff must demonstrate “a strong countervailing rationale” against implied preclusion. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:44 am
In the 2006 McClarty v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:22 pm
Later, a more conservative Supreme Court once again began to enforce limits on federal Commerce Clause authority, starting with United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 11:11 pm
Smith and 2006’s State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 11:11 pm
Smith and 2006’s State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 8:45 am
Indeed, no reported California state court decision has endorsed the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, and we are of the view that California courts “have been clear in their expression that section 16600 represents a strong public policy of the state which should not be diluted by judicial fiat. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am
Perry, et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
There, he condemned race-based affirmative action in strong language. [read post]
