Search for: "Young v. State"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 8,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2009, 6:50 am
The case is Fellner v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:57 am
A7171A
Abbate (MS) -- Provides procedures for resolution of disputes between a public employer and Suffolk county probation officers Same as S 4872 BLURB : Civ Serv. res ds Sflk Cty pk polLast Act: 04/24/09 amend and recommit to governmental employees04/24/09 print number 7171aA7196A
Weisenberg -- Creates the mandatory ignition interlock program; repealer Same as S 27-B BLURB : V & T L. mand ignition interlock Last Act: 04/24/09 amend and… [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:15 pm
Earlier this week, in the FCC v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 7:54 pm
In reasons for judgement released yesterday (Williamson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:40 am
The contents . . . startled [Jacobsen], who . . . expected to receive photographs of `young men 18 years or older.'" U.S. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 1:38 pm
" The case is Moore v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 7:46 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
The Court handed down published opinions in the following cases:AP-75,352, Christopher Anthony Young v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:05 am
Thus, Young did not rebut the State's race-neutral reason for striking the juror. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:58 am
ADAMS v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:05 pm
Dent v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:29 am
The argument in Safford United School District v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:43 am
The Court referred to Goglio v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:02 am
The Court granted the media request seeking same-day access to the audio of arguments in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:20 am
Allegedly.You (understandably) want to strike a deal with the United States, which has indicted you. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:07 am
The case was Ernst & Young, et al., v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 2:30 am
., v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 8:14 am
Both require more detailed blogging (which will happen over the weekend), but, to get started . . .Peter Goldberger provides this summary of United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 7:00 am
The Arizona courts address this in a case called "Piner v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
He successfully argued Spinelli v. [read post]
