Search for: "*southern Home v. Thomas" Results 61 - 80 of 218
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Yet, at a minimum, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas are open to rethinking due process along originalist lines (see Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Thomas graduated from Yale Law School in 1974, one year after the Court handed down Roe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Amanda Shanor
By a 5-4 vote in Tandon v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Harry Thomas, Jr., former U.S. ambassador to Zimbabwe. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
Chien Professor of Law Santa Clara University School of Law Thomas F. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:20 am by Chris Seaton
” “New standard operating procedure per Sheriff’s orders,” said one in a thick Southern drawl. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
Even Professor Thomas Grey, who recognized Holmes as a pragmatist, seemed to ignore it. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Attorney for the Southern District of New York Geoffrey Berman “should influence the public’s understanding [of] the stakes of Seila Law v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 11:18 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Supreme Court failed to reach the merits in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: For this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, Amy Howe reports that “[a] southern California church has asked the Supreme Court to block the enforcement of stay-at-home orders issued by California and San Diego County, arguing that the orders are unconstitutional because they discriminate against places of worship. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 15 April 2020 the High Court handed down judgment in the case of Smethurst v Commissioner of Police [2020] HCA 14 holding that that the warrant the Australian Federal Police used to search News Corp journalist Annika Smethurst’s home in 2019 was invalid. [read post]