Search for: "-WMC In re the Application of Chevron Corporation" Results 61 - 80 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm by WIMS
In this complicated case involving an environmental damages action in Ecuador, South America and a New Jersey environmental consulting firm, the Appeals Court explains, this matter comes on before this Court on appeal from a District Court's order entered June 15, 2010, granting Chevron Corporation the opportunity to engage in discovery pursuant to its application under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:58 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Kaplan's ruling Wednesday in In re Application of Chevron Corp., 10 MC 00002, stands, Chevron's counsel from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and counsel for two former Chevron lawyers facing criminal charges in Ecuador will be able to ask lead plaintiffs attorney Steven Donziger questions, under oath, about his alleged attempts to influence a supposedly neutral expert appointed by the Ecuadorean court to offer a global damages assessment. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am by Susan Schneider
Legal Education Foundation and Oxford-Russia Fund academic grantsAdmitted to practice law in RussiaAuthored Responsibility of Transnational Corporations for Human Rights Violations for the International Legal Conference, Novgorod State University.David JacksonJ.D., University of KansasB.A., George Mason University (English)Former practicing attorney, Miller and Company, P.CAdmitted to the Missouri Bar and the Court of International Trade Bar; Passed Customs Broker Examination (license… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:33 pm by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’), Region II, of a proposed cost recovery settlement agreement pursuant to Section 122(h) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(h), with CBS Corporation (the ‘‘Settling Party’’) for the Kentucky Avenue Wellfield Superfund Site (‘‘Site’’) in the Town of Horseheads and the Village of Horseheads in Chemung County, New York. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:28 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Or ambiguity might cause a judge to defer to an agency’s view of the statute, as under the Chevron doctrine. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)   Israel The strange affair of Israel patent application nos. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
lanka (Class 46) The beer name no one wants to protect – geographical indication cancellation application (Class 46) PDO costs too high for Höllen Sprudel – another cancellation application (Class 46) FRANDly EU decision in Rambus case (IPEG) Recent EPC rule changes restrict filing of Divisional Applications (Patents4Life)   France Tribunal de Grande Instance finds infringement in Evac c.s. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
Only until their corporate clients find out (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Discussion of The Hill op-ed by Sen Hatch ‘1952 law belies out progress in sciences’ (IP Watchdog) Ocean Tomo does rating deal with France’s state bank (IAM) Did you know... importation is a separate requirement in section 337 cases? [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:49 pm
Further, right now, the USPTO needs all the applications they can get. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(IP finance)   Global - Patents Thomson Reuters study reveals world’s most innovative organisations by patent grants and applications (IAM) Entrepreneurs: Ask two simple questions to determine whether IP strategy is critical to your new business venture (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) If a robot invents, who’s the inventor? [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 4:13 pm
" Gaeta, slip op. at 8, citing Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
  In addition, a majority composed of Chairman Battista and Member Schaumber reversed the judge's finding that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(3) by suspending, discharging, re-suspending, and failing properly to reinstate John Callahan. [read post]