Search for: "Adam Wagner"
Results 61 - 80
of 399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2013, 5:07 pm
Following a request on Twitter by Adam Wagner of the “UK Human Rights Blog” for a breakdown down of the cases by category he had two responses. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:54 pm
Thanks to Adam Wagner at UKHR Blog for alerting me to today’s* publication of “A joint publication of The President of the Family Division, the Judicial College and the Society of Editors” entitled “Media Access & Reporting”, which comes just as I was about to put finger to keyboard and begin to type a blog post containing a proposal in respect of that very topic…Of which more momentarily… Apparently the document arises from “a… [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Snyder v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
See Adam Wagner’s post. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:51 am
I’ll leave it to Adam Wagner to do the sensible stuff….worth a read. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 5:49 am
"Danger invites rescue" Justice Cardozo famously wrote in 1926 in Wagner v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
See Adam Wagner’s latest post on open justice. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
May 24, 2011 Adam Wagner Filed under: In the news Tagged: human rights [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:51 am
March 22, 2011 Adam Wagner Filed under: In the news [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 8:24 pm
University of Kansas Robert Wagner (Case Western Law) Lewis and Clark Lisa LeSage and Bob Miller (Lewis and Clark Law) Marquette Ysole Gendreau (University of Montreal Research and Public Rights) Sandra Day O’Connor David Gartner (Arizona State Law) UC Hastings Adam Kurland (Howard Law) [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:42 am
.” Full story The Guardian, 25th January 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk Related link: Podcast: Adam Wagner – My advice to the Court [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 1:25 pm
Adam Wagner did the first one, and next up is Giles Peaker (of the excellent Nearly Legal Housing Law blog)... [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:37 am
Writing on the UK Human Rights Blog, barrister Adam Wagner, somewhat despairingly, referred to the "sound of tumbleweed greeting secret civil trials proposals". [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:52 pm
1-6-2008 Ohio:Six Seneca county residents are contesting the Adam Walsh Act that changed their sex offender classification. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am
Adam Wagner briefly discusses some of the proposals, with the most controversial being the suggestion that Ministers could be given a power to overrule ECtHR judgments. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner) Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality… [read post]
6 May 2011, 12:19 am
I will not post substantively on it at present, owing to pressures of work and because Adam Wagner at UK Human Rights Blog has prepared this excellent analysis of the case and the issues it highlights (Post entitled “Judge: Telegraph reporting of family case was “unbalanced, inaccurate and just plain wrong””). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 11:38 am
Indeed, given Chief Justice Wagner’s suggestion, it is worth noting a critique of his own performance during the question and answer session, by (now) Dean Adam Dodek, who suggested in a Globe and Mail commentary, that since the first hearing “the hearings have since denigrated into a legal equivalent of a Seinfeld episode: a hearing about nothing – or at least nothing of legal significance”. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 12:00 am
” Max Boot (in the NY Times) is skeptical, as are Margaret MacMillan (in the Financial Times), Adam Roberts (in the Telegraph, and behind a paywall) and Louis Menand (in the New Yorker). [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The headline here, as has been widely tweeted/flashed etc, is that the challenge to the bedroom tax contained in Regulation B13, Housing Benefit Regulations (both generically and specifically in relation to households with a disabled person) was unsuccessful in the Divisional Court (R(MA) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 2213 - not on Baili yet, but available to download from Adam Wagner’s site); but the Court came close to… [read post]
