Search for: "Adoption of Barnett" Results 61 - 80 of 572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2012, 9:01 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) On TNR.com, Jeff Rosen has a thoughtful response to the criticism engendered by his New Republic magazine essay on Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 2:57 am
  The panel includes three new originalists--Barnett, Whittington, and Balkin. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Jonathan Barnett (USC Gould School of Law), on Monday, September 25, 2023 Editor's Note: Jonathan Barnett is a Professor of Law at USC Gould School of Law. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Jonathan Barnett (USC Gould School of Law), on Monday, September 25, 2023 Editor's Note: Jonathan Barnett is a Professor of Law at USC Gould School of Law. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by David Kopel and Randy Barnett
Randy Barnett is Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Legal Theory at Georgetown Law. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 1:33 pm by John McFarland
The examiners recommended standard units of 320 acres, the same as the rules for the Newark, East (Barnett Shale) Field. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:07 am
Barnett also argues that even if the original Ninth bound only the federal government, the same set of rights protected by the Ninth were applied against the states in the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:50 am by Randy Barnett
In none of its briefs to date has the government adopted Orin’s approach. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:48 pm by Ilya Somin
But the validity of a position does not depend on people’s motives for adopting it. [read post]
12 May 2011, 11:23 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) In their posts below, both Jonathan Adler and Randy Barnett suggest that it’s okay for the proposed activity/inactivity distinction to be unclear because the “actus reus” distinction has been unclear for a long time and the world hasn’t ended. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) William Howell, the Speaker of the Virginia House of Delegates, and I have an op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal making the case for a constitutional amendment giving 2/3 of state legislatures the power to repeal any federal law or regulation. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:00 am by Ilya Somin
Among the signers are six of the Volokh Conspirators — Jonathan Adler, Randy Barnett, David Bernstein, David Post, Sasha Volokh, and myself. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:01 pm by Randy Barnett
Perhaps Justice Scalia will someday extend this theory to include the power to regulate inactivity (or to mandate that persons engage in economic activity) when doing so is essential to a broader regulatory scheme, and it will be adopted by five justices. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
  If Rawls is right, Professor Barnett took the wrong side in the Obamacare case. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:57 am by Randy E. Barnett
The adoption of the Declaration, and the public affirmation of its principles, led directly to the phased in abolition of slavery in half of the United States by the time the Constitution was drafted–as well as the abolition of slavery in the Northwest Territory. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 5:26 am by Randy E. Barnett
The adoption of the Declaration, and the public affirmation of its principles, led directly to the abolition of slavery in half of the United States by the time the Constitution was drafted just 11 years later. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 8:00 am by Randy E. Barnett
The adoption of the Declaration, and the public affirmation of its principles, led directly to the phased in abolition of slavery in half of the United States by the time the Constitution was drafted as well as the abolition of slavery in the Northwest Territory. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 7:18 am by Randy E. Barnett
The adoption of the Declaration, and the public affirmation of its principles, led directly to the phased in abolition of slavery in half of the United States by the time the Constitution was drafted as well as the abolition of slavery in the Northwest Territory. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:05 pm by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) If the Supreme Court invalidates the individual insurance mandate, it need not call into question any other law that has ever been passed in the history of the United States. [read post]