Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey" Results 61 - 80 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
New Jersey lawyer Steven Sanders, who has long been thoughtfully examining the issue of how to deal with Blakely errors, sent me this thoughtful comment about Justice Scalia's curious work yesterday in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
First, the prior cases in a nutshell, [Apprendi]invalidated New Jersey’s hate-crime statute, which gave judges the power to make the specific factual findings that converted an ordinary crime into a hate crime, with an enhanced sentence. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
NEW JERSEY, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), JONES v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:05 pm
New Jersey have been glossed over while the federal courts grow more backlogged in the process. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:37 pm by Jon Sands
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 4:59 pm
New Jersey, assigning to the jury rather than the judge the duty of finding the facts needed to support more severe punishment for a crime. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm by WIMS
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), where a judge, and not a jury, determined the facts as to the number of days of violation under a schedule of fines.         [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:11 am
New Jersey in 2000 is limited to sentencing for single crimes, not to the arrangement for  punishing multiple offenses. [read post]