Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases" Results 61 - 80 of 367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The appeals panel found that plaintiffs properly pled a cause of action for negligence and willful and wanton misconduct under both Arizona and Texas law and loss of child consortium under Arizona law and thus the case was remanded back for further proceedings consistent with that opinion. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  These governmental entities also should seek the advice of qualified legal counsel about the advisability of taking any retrospective action to self-correct any potential past deficiencies in compliance, if any, for which the entity might bear potential liability to the extent that the applicable state of limitations has not run on those claims. [1] Justice Kavanaugh did not join in the opinion as he took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Misclassification of workers providing services as non-employees increasingly causes U.S. businesses to incur unanticipated FLSA and other wage and hour law liability for back pay, liquidated punitive damages, civil monetary penalties and other liability, in part because of WHD’s stepped up worker education, scrutiny, investigation, and enforcement challenging employers’ treatment of workers as non-employees. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Legal Background in Mount Lemmon Fire District v Guido The key issue in the case was whether the ADEA exempts political subdivisions of a state with less than 20 employees. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:17 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Whiting: Arizona may administer the “business death penalty” to employers who hire illegal immigrants.Williamson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:07 am by Joe Consumer
So, the case that might get most attention is Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:07 am by Joe Consumer
So, the case that might get most attention is Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. [read post]
  The risk is not so much in these practical revelations of who is vaccinated, but rather in how they are treated; management and supervisors should be trained to not exclude masked individuals from meetings, projects, business travel, and other employment opportunities, because doing so may inadvertently trigger disability, religious or disparate impact liabilities. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:08 pm by Lou M
Rizo received a 5% bump up from her $50,000 salary in Arizona, and then was placed on Step One of the hiring schedule. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:19 pm by Hirsch & Lyon
  We have handled straightforward injury cases, as well as more complicated cases involving high-conflict issues relating to workers’ compensation benefits and potential third-party liability. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 2:45 pm by Hirsch & Lyon Accident Law
When litigating a claim against a commercial truck driver — and thanks to the application of vicarious liability principles, their employer — you may find that establishing negligence is somewhat “easier” to do than litigating a claim against a non-commercial driver. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 2:05 pm
The endangered species case grows out of a move by the state of Arizona to take over from EPA the program of regulating permits for discharge of pollutants under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
17 May 2021, 3:33 pm by Amy Howe
The court asked the federal20-807, government to weigh in on questions arising from the Locomotive Inspection Act and the Federal EmployersLiability Act, which provides the only remedy for railroad workers injured on the job. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kedar Bhatia
(Sotomayor, J., recused)   March (5) Arizona v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 12:34 pm by Michael Lowe
For more on the intricacies of mortgage fraud, check out our web page discussing mortgage fraud or read Michael Lowe’s case result in a Dallas mortgage fraud case “LESS THAN ONE HALF GUIDELINE SENTENCE ON DALLAS FEDERAL MORTGAGE FRAUD CASE” as an example of defending against these charges. 1. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:06 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Shortly thereafter, the plaintiff amended his complaint, raising a new claim for vicarious liability against the defendant's employer, under the doctrine of respondeat superior. [read post]