Search for: "Arnold v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 1,494
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm by Guest Author
The SEC’s Office of Economic Analysis’ 2009 Study on Section 404 states this point more explicitly: “Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act requires companies to maintain effective ICFR, while Section 404 requires management to report on the effectiveness of ICFR. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
  Arnold LJ agreed, and was fortified in his opinion by a similar ruling from the US Supreme Court in WesternGeco v Ion Geophysical. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm by centerforartlaw
To conclude, Passman stated that the decision to choose a trust ultimately comes down to the artist’s goals. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:28 am by INFORRM
In deciding this question, the Court had regard to the Grand Chamber’s judgment in Perinçek v Switzerland [2015] ECHR 907 [26]-[27], which stated that Article 17 only applies ‘on an exceptional basis and in extreme cases’ and, further, that the decisive point under Article 17 is whether ‘the applicant’s statements sought to stir up hatred or violence, and whether by making them he attempted to rely on the Convention to engage in an activity or… [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 1:00 am by CMS
However, with reference to the decision in Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36, the court considered that it is not its job to rescue a tenant from an “imprudent term” in a lease. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am by INFORRM
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm by James Kwong
Jordan of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:49 am by Florian Mueller
And indeed, Lord Justice Arnold held that "[e]ach side has adopted its position in an attempt to game the system in its favour" and generally criticizes what he considers "the dysfunctional state of the current system for determining SEP/FRAND disputes. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
              The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]