Search for: "Barrett v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2025, 1:45 pm
I also find Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s insightful concurring opinion in Biden v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 8:55 am
Other clauses use the word “office” or “officer” followed by a modifier, such as “of the United States,” “under the United States,” or “under the Authority of the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
During last month’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 1:03 pm
Other clauses use the word "office" or "officer" followed by a modifier, such as "of the United States," "under the United States," or "under the Authority of the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 12:23 am
United States, No. 2:25-cv-00001; Davis v. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 1:43 pm
For example, during oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 10:14 am
The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments on Wednesday in Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 12:00 am
Disqualification for engaging in insurrection is no different from disqualification based on other constitutional requirements such as age, citizenship from birth and 14 years’ residency in the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 9:11 am
Section 2383 permits a finding for liability if one "engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 9:05 am
I sat closer to the Justices this time than in the more highly-attended arguments for United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 8:36 am
Barrett Financial * 512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership Dispute–Shande v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 1:23 pm
His attorneys lost every round in the New York State judiciary and found themselves one justice away from another victory before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 11:31 am
As I recall, Seth Barrett Tillman was the first person to raise the Scalia opinion in late December 2016. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 4:11 am
The best reason I can come up with is that under the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 11:29 pm
United States, Justice Barrett disagreed with the majority's ruling that the court could not admit "immune" actions as evidence in the trial. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 5:01 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s July 2024 ruling in Trump v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 2:07 pm
United States Sec. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 10:23 pm
Second, Roberts offers this account of the Bank of the United States debate and McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Dec 2024, 9:24 pm
Is such a position an "Officer of the United States"? [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am
’” That is how Chief Justice Mike McGrath referred to the Montana constitution’s provision that ensures the citizens of Montana the “right to a clean and healthful environment” and on which he grounded the majority’s opinion in his December 18, 2024, holiday gift to the environment and the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
