Search for: "Bartlett v. State of California"
Results 61 - 80
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
Henry Waxman of California. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Dale Carpenter discusses the amicus brief he filed in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:24 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, while Scottie Thomaston of Equality on Trial covers the National Organization for Marriage’s brief in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:07 am
Justice Voigt respectfully dissented.Case Name: EDWARD VENARD v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
Today’s metoclopramide case, Gardley-Starks v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:02 am
Perry – constitutionality of California’s “Proposition 8″ ban on same-sex marriage; also, question of standing to appeal Wednesday, March 27: 12-307 — United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:01 am
That argument was raised recently in a commentary by Bartlett D. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:48 pm
Lee defeats (26) California v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:47 am
Lee (358US217) — Indians have right to make own laws and be ruled by them v. (26) California v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm
I ran into this dilemma the other day when discussing the classic case of Moore v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
California Ramirez v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaDocket: 09-1254Issue(s): (1) Whether, in enacting a state statute extending the statute of limitations applicable to claims for the recovery of property stolen during the Holocaust against museums and galleries, the State of California was addressing an area of “traditional state responsibility” without intruding on the federal foreign affairs power; (2) whether a state statute extending the statute of… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:27 pm
Amicus brief for the State of California Amicus brief for the Commission for Art Recovery Petitioner’s reply CVSG Information: Invited: October 4, 2010 Filed: May 27, 2011 (Deny) Title: Osage Nation v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
A raft of California intermediate appellate decisions applies the learned intermediary rule to medical devices. [read post]
