Search for: "Beer v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
OH11: Judicial intergrity justifies exclusion; warrantless entry for noise complaint was unjustified
10 Aug 2008, 3:30 pm
State v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:55 pm
The United States opposed the judges’ petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 3:35 pm
I was reading the court’s “Guide for Counsel in Cases to be Argued Before the Supreme Court of the United States” and I noticed a reference to a very recent case: For an excellent example of a counsel who was intimately familiar with her client's business, see the transcript of argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:19 am
Recall, for example, Olmstead v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 3:01 pm
” To establish priority of use, a party must show that its owns a mark or trade name previously used in the United States and not abandoned. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm
United States, 674 F.3d 509, 532-33 (6th Cir. 2012). [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:43 am
Since the venerable case of Ace Beer Distributors v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
With the explosion of craft beers in the United States, we can now do the same with our ales and lagers too. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
A Sniff Is A Search By Any Other Name, But Is It Reliable? Florida v. Jardines and Florida v. Harris
31 Mar 2013, 7:51 am
The United States Supreme Court handily sided with Aldo, ruling unanimously that K9 officers had no such duty to maintain field performance history and records of purported “false positives. [read post]
A Sniff Is A Search By Any Other Name, But Is It Reliable? Florida v. Jardines and Florida v. Harris
31 Mar 2013, 7:51 am
The United States Supreme Court handily sided with Aldo, ruling unanimously that K9 officers had no duty to maintain field performance history and records of purported “false positives. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
The Supreme Court of the United State’s ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:11 pm
It is officially part of the United States, but it isn’t really a state. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm
United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987). [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:18 am
On August 5, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the TTAB’s decision to cancel a trademark registration for the mark HOLLYWOOD BEER as a discovery sanction for the registrant’s repeated, frivolous filings and failure to comply with discovery orders. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
United States, 10-7515, for United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 1:04 pm
United States is a Court of International Trade case about the tariff classification of bioreactors. [read post]
