Search for: "Caine v. Caine" Results 61 - 80 of 556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2015, 7:59 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow in Brumfield v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:00 am by Bruce Cain and Emily Zhang
Cain) As people come to grips with the seismic political impact of the Dobbs v Jackson decision last week, the question of partisan skew in the state government landscape has come up. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 7:13 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Monday Brumfield v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:26 am
Here are the appeals the SCC will be hearing this week.Jan. 9 — Saskatchewan — Benjamin Cain MacKenzie v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:57 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Barclay v British Airways Plc [2008] EWCA Civ 1419 (18 December 2008) DL (DRC) v The Entry Clearance Officer, Pretoria [2008] EWCA Civ 1420 (18 December 2008) Cain v Francis [2008] EWCA Civ 1451 (18 December 2008) Revenue and Customs v Alan Blackburn Sports Ltd & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 1454 (18 December 2008) Gargett, [...] [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:44 pm by jmaddock
Benjamin Cain MacKenzie was subject to a traffic stop, during which police developed a suspicion that he was trafficking drugs. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:29 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Controlled Substances Cocaine base “[C]ocaine base,” as used in 21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1), means not just “crack co-caine,” but cocaine in its chemically basic form. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 10:31 pm by Paul Caron
Jordan Barry (San Diego), Patricia Cain (Santa Clara), Bryan Camp (Texas Tech) & Keith Fogg (Villanova) have filed Amicus Curiae Brief in Health and Human Services v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:24 am by INFORRM
In the case of Times Newspapers Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; and, Frost and others v MGN Ltd ([2017] UKSC 33), the defendant media organisations each brought an appeal to the Supreme Court in relation to the obligation that they pay additional liabilities in cases engaging their right to freedom of expression. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 4:31 am by Julia Zebley
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled 8-1 [opinion, PDF] Tuesday in Smith v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 6:30 am
Phoenix's East Valley Tribune reported yesterday that the Arizona Supreme Court has agreed to grant review in Cain v. [read post]