Search for: "California v. Southern Pacific Co." Results 61 - 80 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:46 am by Erin Miller
Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. (09-958) and two linked cases, PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
Washington Beef is owned by AgriBeef Co., a privately-held company in Boise, Idaho. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
– Steve Limitiaco, Pacific Daily News, March 31, 2010 The Guam Waterworks Authority, which is years behind on court-ordered improvements to the island’s water and wastewater systems, plans to negotiate a new settlement agreement with the U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
(Docket Report) District Court C D California: Real world difficulty in combining prior art teachings does not [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Click Here Pacific Pipelines to pay penalty for oil spill. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Bricker (Pacific McGeorge), Juliana V. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
“Maricopa County’s particulate air pollution is a serious problem,” said Deborah Jordan, director of the Air Division in the EPA’s Pacific Southwest office. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:19 pm
Southern California Edison Co., 955 F. 2d 1373 (1992) it had joined its sister circuits in holding that claims of price squeezing under Section 2 are viable against monopolists in regulated industries. [read post]