Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2011, 12:12 pm
On August 18, the California Supreme Court ruled in the case of Howell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 7:23 am
Harris v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:52 am
Duro Bag Manufacturing Company, Case No. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:55 pm
He lives in San Diego and is in the process of becoming a member of the California bar. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:28 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:55 pm
Some e-commerce companies have experimented with personalized pricing, sometimes with negative consumer and press reaction, and there have been suggestions by some commentators that the practice is or should be illegal. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
Freeman v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 11:08 am
In Bolger v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 8:26 am
Gradient even touted to potential customers how much a negative report on Gradient could cause the share price of a company to drop. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:32 pm
,dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications (07-512). [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:39 am
The court concluded that although the company’s stock price dropped after the company disclosed a failure to meet revenue projections, the plaintiffs did not establish any actionable misrepresentations. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:06 pm
The California Supreme Court held in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 2:49 pm
See Kosta v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 1:02 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 8:44 am
Morsell v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 12:13 pm
" True that, I guess.)The Court of Appeal not only affirms, but also drops a footnote: "We assume the trial court and attorney Weisberg have already reported the judicially imposed sanctions to the State Bar of California. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:23 pm
Cal. 2012) In a bold move, non-practicing patent holder CCI has sued a group of tech companies and the patent aggregator RPX for price fixing and conspiring to restrain trade in violation of the Clayton and Sherman Acts as well as under California state antitrust law. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:36 am
Here, for example, is the certificate for a subordinated debenture issued by Equity Funding of America, the company that starred in Dirks v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Loral Corp. v. [read post]
