Search for: "Cavanagh v. Kelly"
Results 61 - 80
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm
But the concurring opinion for three Justices shows how this is really about the Democracy Canon: CAVANAGH, MARILYN KELLY, and HATHAWAY, JJ. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:54 pm
In People v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:49 pm
In People v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:20 am
” Justice Cavanagh dissented, joined by Justice Kelly and Justice Hathaway. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:25 am
Justice Kelly's dissent: Justice Kelly wrote a well-reasoned dissent. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:33 pm
In two dissents, Justices Cavanagh and Hathaway (each joined by Justice Kelly) argued the majority was “creat[ing] an illogical and unworkable rule” that closes the door to justice except in “the rarest of situations. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:06 am
” In People v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 12:26 pm
Justices Cavanagh, Marilyn Kelly, and Hathaway would grant rehearing in Atkins. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 6:32 am
Justices Weaver and Kelly joined Justice Cavanagh's dissent. [read post]
26 May 2010, 1:03 pm
On May 25, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court published its decision in DeCosta v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:36 pm
Chief Justice Kelly and Justices Cavanagh and Hathaway dissented. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm
Justices Cavanagh and Marilyn Kelly would grant the application in People v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:50 pm
Justice Cavanagh, writing for himself and Chief Justice Kelly, would reverse the Court of Appeals on both issues. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:20 am
Markman, Mary Beth Kelly and Brian K. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:29 pm
In Wilcox v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:47 am
Justice Cavanagh, in an opinion joined by Justice Kelly, concurred in part and dissented in part. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
In an opinion authored by Justice Markman, and joined by Chief Justice Kelly, and Justices Cavanagh and Corrigan, the majority concluded that Frank had been unjustly enriched because he enjoyed sole ownership of the properties as a result of Janet’s maintenance payments, because they otherwise would have been subject to foreclosure. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:26 pm
Justice Cavanagh, joined by Justice Marilyn Kelly, concurred with the majority’s result only. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:13 pm
In Michigan v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 1:09 pm
Duncan v Michigan was then heading for oral argument before the Michigan Supreme Court and it looked like the challenge was going to acquire some legs. [read post]
