Search for: "DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 61 - 80
of 393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm
Federalism by Jury in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:46 am
United States, an insider trading case. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 5:38 pm
Button, United Mine Workers of America v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Mitchell’s lead argument, to which he devoted far more pages in his briefs than any other, was that although Donald Trump served as “the President of the United States of America,” Art. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Clapper v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
During the time that she lived at Betty Shabazz Village, Davis worked at the United States Attorney's Office and the U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 3:32 am
Andersen claims the association and a company called MediaSentry "conspired to develop a massive threat and litigation enterprise targeting private citizens across the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am
Kavanaugh’s views on that subject can best be inferred from an opinion he wrote shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am
Davis. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
Stephen Davis, will be seeking investor feedback on a formal recommendation to the SEC as to its potential response to the Citizens United decision. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:26 am
In October 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an important decision concerning the extraterritorial application of the U.S. securities laws, Morrison v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 12:06 pm
Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
-Davis J. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:31 am
” Finally, in another post at Lawfare, Julian Davis Mortenson makes a different point: “Regardless of how the Supreme Court decides Zivotofsky, it should not invoke the Vesting Clause” – which provides that “[t]he executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America” – “to support its decision. [read post]
1 May 2013, 11:43 am
The Court relied on the Third Circuit's decision in Race Tires America, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:51 pm
United States:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states-complaint For more on FOSTA:https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/how-congress-censored-internet Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org AaronMackeyStaff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm
I guess there are written or at least unwritten rules in the United States that would prevent this from happening in the first place. [read post]
