Search for: "David B. Goldstein" Results 61 - 80 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
§ 1395y(b)(2), establishes a cause of action for private insurers operating Medicare Advantage plans to sue tortfeasors for double damages. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:04 am by John L. Welch
"In the request to amend the decision, filed on March 1, 2012 (here), Opposer's counsel, David B. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:17 am
Exhibits B and C: Jenner & Block and Powell Goldstein also recently demoted or fired partners. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
National Press Club Ballroom, 13th Floor 529 14th Street, NW Washington, DC http://press.org/ (Business attire recommended) Awards Presenter ABA President Carolyn B. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:41 am by Amy Howe
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on amicus briefs filed in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:02 am by Amy Howe
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in DIRECTV; however, I am not affiliated with the firm.] [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am by Marissa Miller
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times reports on one of the cases on last week’s Conference, Siegelman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:19 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  So do directors, except David Mamet. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
§ 271(b) even though no one has committed direct infringement under Section 271(a). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, “[b]ut that hasn’t stopped some places from betting on the outcome. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:19 pm by Mark Walsh
As explained in David Engstrom’s preview, the law’s original statute of limitations, Section 3731(b)(1), requires lawsuits to be filed within six years of the alleged fraud. [read post]