Search for: "Differ v. Smith (INMATE 2)" Results 61 - 77 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
Florida, 15-6075, and Smith v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
The question presented is what standard the federal court should apply in considering such a claim, and in particular whether the federal court can consider evidence that was not presented to the state courts. ------- Title: Smith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm by John Elwood
Lumpkin, 20-7065, is a capital case involving a prisoner on death row for killing a fellow inmate suspected of snitching on a shipment of smuggled tobacco. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
In addition, on 4 May 2007, the Tennessee Attorney General requested an execution date for Daryl Holton, a former soldier with a history of depression, who has effectively waived his appeals and has been found competent to do so.The execution of another "volunteer", Carey Dean Moore, due to be carried out in Nebraska on 8 May 2007, was stopped by the state Supreme Court on 2 May in view of concerns - not raised by Moore - about Nebraska's use of the electric chair. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/840393.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 10:07 am by Phil Dixon
As for the defendant’s Eighth Amendment claim, the court determined that sex offender registration was not a “punishment” pursuant to Smith v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am by Phil Dixon
Agents observed him make several quick visits to different locations, at times bringing one package into a location and leaving with a different package. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
The document was published on 14 December 2006 and the consultation period closed on 7 March 2007.The position of prisoners on remand is covered by the Representation of the People Act 2000.Contents1 Background 2 The position in other countries 3 Lobbying for change 4 ECHR decision: Hirst v the United Kingdom 5 The Government's response to the ECHR ruling 6 ECHR appeal decision 7 Consultation on prisoners' voting rights 8 The Government's proposed options for… [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
The judicial discussion revolves around how, on the one hand, an online trial would require the accused to give up at least some of his constitutional rights (such as the right to face his accuser), and on the other, the reality that inmates face increased risks of infection. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 5:50 am by Janet Lord
Enslavement, as defined in Article 7(2)(c) of the Rome Statute, prohibits the “exercise of … the right of ownership over a person. [read post]