Search for: "Dirks v. SEC"
Results 61 - 80
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 6:30 am
Larcker and Brian Tayan (Stanford University), on Monday, May 13, 2024 Tags: CEOs, ESG, Proxy advisors, SEC The CEO Pay Problem Is Solvable with A.I. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:00 am
” The Government also argued that the Seventh Circuit’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:06 am
But under Dirks v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:44 am
SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983), and the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 11:05 am
United States, Dirks v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:30 pm
Newman 15-137Issue: Whether the court of appeals erroneously departed from this Court's decision in Dirks v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 9:32 am
In Dirks v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 6:21 am
This was the underpinning of an important Supreme Court case thirty years ago – Dirks v SEC – which held that an employee who told a securities analyst about a fraud at the employee’s company had not breached a fiduciary duty to the company (and hence under applicable law the securities analyst could not be prosecuted for insider trading based on this disclosure). [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:54 am
Eddy, and Sabastian V. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 6:30 am
FEC, Elections, FEC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:19 pm
Although Sean Stewart was charged for his role as a tipper rather than a tippee like the defendants in Newman, the holding there was still implicated because insider trading law under Dirks v. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 6:30 am
FEC, Elections, FEC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:45 am
In the seminal Supreme Court case of Dirks v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:28 pm
After Dirks v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTE [1] Dirks v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983). [4] Dirks v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 6:18 am
Pivotal Software, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 12:13 pm
The Second Circuit relied upon a thirty year old Supreme Court opinion, Dirks v. [read post]