Search for: "District of Columbia v. Barnes" Results 61 - 80 of 101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Cacace involved the latest attempt to get the Court to explore whether its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:52 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
In light of the decision in Loving et al v Commissioner where the court ruled that the Internal Revenue Service did not have the authority to regulate tax preparers, the IRS has issued the following statement: As of Friday, Jan. 18, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has enjoined the Internal Revenue Service from enforcing the regulatory requirements for registered tax return preparers. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:39 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
This resource provides a wide range of information for all fifty states plus the District of Columbia, regarding laws that restrict the use of cameras in and around polling places (as well as other journalistic activities). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
District Court for the District of Columbia last week relied on Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to bar Texas from enforcing its photo ID requirement for voters in this fall’s election. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:32 am by Marissa Miller
  In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes discusses amicus briefs filed on both sides in American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
Pharmaceutical cases that warrant federal court multi-district litigation (MDL) treatment typically involve complex scientific and statistical issues. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Joshua Matz
” At Fox News, Shannon Bream reports that gun ownership remains difficult to achieve in some parts of the country, notwithstanding the Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:55 am by Kali Borkoski
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the reasoning on which they relied to reach that conclusion varied. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division (EEOC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm by Marie Louise
Verizon (EDTexweblog.com) District Court Columbia: Bilski applied to invalidate computer system claims: CLS Bank Int’l v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Foxhall Surgical Assocs., 694 A.2d 435, 439-40 (D.C. 1997); Barnes v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:35 am by Adam Solomon
The merchants being investigated include: Barnes & Noble, Orbitz.com, Buy.com, Ticketmaster.com, MovieTickets.com, FTD.com, Shutterfly.com, 1-800Flowers.com, Avon.com, Budget, Staples.com, Priceline.com, GMAC Mortgage, Classmates.com, Travelocity, Vistaprint, Intelius, Hotwire.com, Expedia/Hotels.com, Columbia House, Pizza Hut and Gamestop/EB Games. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
  Applying Jackson, a federal district court concluded that “Arkansas has not adopted alternative or market share liability,” in Fields v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm by Jeff Gamso
At her hearings last summer, she told the committee that she considered the court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by admin
Also at NPR, Larry Abramson describes the complaints that, notwithstanding the Court’s decision two years ago in District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:26 pm by INFORRM
In this post we round up recent decisions and blog posts on freedom of expression and media law issues which may be of interest to our readers around the world The case of Snyder v Phelps has been much discussed this week after forty-eight states and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief supporting the appeal. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
Although 37 states and the District of Columbia permit juvenile life-without-parole sentences, he wrote that in practice the sentence is highly disfavored. [read post]