Search for: "Dolan v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
By its own terms, Georgia’s stalking statute “shall not apply to persons engaged in activities protected by the Constitution of the United States or of this state. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 9:46 am by Steven Boutwell
  Under guidance from the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Daimler AG v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:01 am
The court held that the plaintiff's Nollan/Dolan claims are takings claims that are not ripe under Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:23 am by Anna Christensen
United States, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:17 am by Erin Miller
United States (09-367) [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 2:07 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Village of Haverstraw) Takings and the Equal Footing Doctrine (United States v. 32.42 Acres of Land) What is "aboriginal land" immune from eminent domain? [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Dolan, 571 F.3d 1022 (10th Cir. 2009) (affirming sentence of Indian convicted of assault) United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:37 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
" As Bryan writes, "it also underscores the ongoing need for the United States Supreme Court to finally address whether the heightened scrutiny of the Nollan, Dolan, and Koontz Fifth Amendment takings cases applies to legislatively imposed permit conditions. [read post]