Search for: "Doyle v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 484
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2021, 4:03 am by Peter Mahler
New York continues to buck the nationwide trend toward harmonization of close corporation and LLC law governing judicial dissolution, as made clear in cases such as Doyle v Icon and Barone v Sowers explicitly holding that New York’s LLC Law § 702 neither mentions nor otherwise accommodates oppression as a basis for seeking judicial dissolution. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
United States Twitter said that the National Archives will not be allowed to resurrect Donald Trump’s tweets, even in its official capacity as a record-keeping organization. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Thus, “‘when it comes to Indian affairs, state courts are courts of limited jurisdiction'” (Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d at 296, quoting Bowen v Doyle, 880 FSupp 99, 114 [WD NY], affd 230 F3d 525 [2d Cir]). [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:11 am by Nedim Malovic
In Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate it was stated, by Judge Posner, that it was impossible to “find any basis in statute or case law for extending a copyright beyond its expiration. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:51 am by Peter Mahler
” She also found that petitioners’ additional allegations of “oppressive conduct,” even if assumed true, did not constitute ground for dissolution under § 702 as construed in Doyle v Icon and other cases. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:36 am by Peter Mahler
Court Upholds LLC Member’s For-Cause Expulsion In Tradesman Program Managers, LLC v Doyle, 2020 NY Slip Op 32452(U) [July 24, 2020], the plaintiff LLC, which serves as a managing general agent for domestic insurance carriers, sought a declaratory judgment validating its for-cause expulsion of the defendant member pursuant to provision in the operating agreement defining “cause” to include a felony conviction. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:16 pm by skelly
 Marsh President and CEO John Doyle seems to support the latter, stating in letters to the lawmakers and the Trump Administration that “[t]here are certain risks, like terrorism, that require the full weight of the United States government to manage in partnership with the insurance industry. [read post]