Search for: "Eady v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2019, 4:02 pm
In Wasserman v Freilich [2016] EWHC 312 (QB), Sir David Eady remarked at the end of his judgment that “an allegation of dishonesty, fraud or attempted fraud will usually fall fairly and squarely on the side of fact rather than opinion. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:12 am
The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld Eady J’s judgment below. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Well known examples of those who can make such a defence are the proprietors of libraries (Vizetelly v Mudie’s Select Library Limited) and newsvendors (Emmens v Pott [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:52 pm
After citing from the Judgment of Eady J. in Mosley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:28 am
Explaining the level of the award, Sir David Eady stated that the allegations were distinctive and very serious, going to the “core attributes” of the Claimant’s personality. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
Ma v St George’s Healthcare Trust, heard 8-10 June 2015 (Sir David Eady) Lachaux v Independent Independent Print,&nb [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:06 pm
In last month’s unanimous judgment in Rothschild v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2013] EWCA Civ 197) the Court of Appeal upheld a decision that the defence of justification had been established in a claim brought by the financier Nat Rothschild against the Daily Mail. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:30 am
He set out the stages laid down by Eady J in Turner v News Group Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm
Shakil-Ur-Rahman v ARY Network Ltd [2016] EWHC 3110 (QB) (Sir David Eady) – the claimant succeeded and recovered damages of £185,000. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm
Sir David Eady heard an application in Cartus v Siddell. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:51 pm
The Court was also unimpressed by the defendants’ point that other generally indicated facts were truly stated. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:12 am
However, the court stated that the extent of that enhanced protection is less clear. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm
Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd, heard 4 February 2015 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
He noted that, because of his conclusion on reasonable expectation of privacy, this strictly speaking did not arise but nevertheless went on to state his finding. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:31 am
Mr Justice Eady refused to grant the injunction. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:33 am
He noted that the Court of Appeal in John v MGN [1997] QB 586 said that the sum awarded must:- ”….compensate [a claimant] for the damage to his reputation; vindicate his good name; and take account of the distress, hurt and humiliation which the defamatory publication has caused” In Cleese v Associated Newspapers [2004] EMLR 3 Eady J noted that “a fundamental point always to be remembered is that the purpose… [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm
, heard 15 January 2016 (Sir David Eady) Hiranandani-Vandrevala v Times Newspapers Limited, heard 20 January 2016 (Nicol J) Burrell v Clifford, heard 25 and 26 January 2016 (Richard Spearman QC) Lokhova v Tymula, heard 26 and 27 January 2016 (Dingemans J) Monks v National Westminster Bank plc heard 28 and 29 January 2016 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
