Search for: "Edwards v. Arthur Andersen" Results 61 - 80 of 103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 11:21 am
By Robert Milligan and Nicholas Waddles The California Supreme Court's decision in Edwards v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 6:59 am
 The court’s decision highlights what the California Supreme Court made clear in its Edwards v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 5:37 am
Arthur Andersen: The California Supreme Court's recent decision in Edwards v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
[Cross-reference to Lemley and Pooley, California Restrictive Employment Covenants after Edwards discussing Edwards v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Stanford University)Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)Banerjee Abhijit V. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
  The plaintiff,  Raymond Edwards (“Edwards”), worked as an accountant for Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”). [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:39 pm
Raymond Edwards was hired by Arthur Andersen as a tax manager in January 1997. [read post]