Search for: "Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue"
Results 61 - 80
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2020, 4:43 am
Montana Department of Revenue — will affect the educational choice movement. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:06 am
Montana Department of Revenue, highlighting a ruling last week from the U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Montana Department of Revenue, [Abstract], 62 South Texas Law Review 13-38 (2022).Eva Quinones, My Body Broken for You: The Case for Overriding Religious Medical Exemptions for Minors, [Abstract], 29 Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law 170-204 (2022). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Sarah Vowell weighs in on Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:03 am
Montana Department of Revenue, will – among other things – put this claim to the test. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:59 am
Espinoza v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
Montana Department of Revenue that states “cannot exclude religious schools from participating on an equal basis in school choice programs” would “advance[] a classical liberal political economy. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:14 am
Soon after the tax-credit program was created, the Montana Department of Revenue issued a rule that bars families from using the scholarships at religious schools. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:04 am
Montana Department of Revenue, 5-4, and Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:59 am
Montana Department of Revenue, Fulton v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:36 am
Montana’s Original Sin By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore Garrett Epps writes about Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:47 am
At Law360 (registration required), Daniel Dalton argues that, should the justices decide Espinoza v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
Montana Department of Revenue. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 3:49 am
Montana Department of Revenue “not only that a state may include religious schools in a voucher program, but that it must include them, if it wants to have a voucher program at all. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am
Montana Department of Revenue, holding that Montana’s exclusion of religious schools from a state-funded scholarship program for private schools violated the First Amendment, “parents will have more options when it comes to directing their kids’ education—whether at secular or religious schools. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 4:05 am
Montana Department of Revenue, which involves a Montana tax-credit program for contributions to a fund providing scholarships that could be used at private schools, including religious schools. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am
Montana Department of Revenue] may seem small: a discontinued state program that offered $150 tax credits to help spur $500 tuition scholarships[, b]ut the stakes are high for both sides in the national debate over public aid for religious schools. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 4:06 am
Supreme Court in” Espinoza v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Montana Department of Revenue (2020); and now Carson v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 7:36 am
This term, in Espinoza v. [read post]
