Search for: "Faretta v. California"
Results 61 - 80
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2009, 10:04 pm
"[Seven months later] on July 17, 2001, the Court engaged in a colloquy with the Defendant, required by Faretta v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 11:59 pm
Faretta, 422 U.S. at 835. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 4:46 pm
More on Faretta v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 12:21 am
California. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:26 pm
California and Godinez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 5:10 pm
Breyer’s vote, mounted a strong bid for the Supreme Court to overrule its 1975 decision in Faretta v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 4:53 pm
., Amdt. 6; Faretta v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:03 am
The Indiana Supreme Court ruled he had a right to act as his own defense counsel, ordering a new trial under Faretta v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 10:23 am
Faretta v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 2:44 pm
The court had declared 25 years before, in Faretta v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:28 pm
The court had declared 25 years before, in Faretta v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:44 pm
In the 1975 case of Faretta vs. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:41 pm
Day, 233 Conn. 813, 828, 661 A.2d 539 (1995), quoting Faretta v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 9:43 am
California. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 2:15 pm
California Criminal Defense Lawyer News People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:21 am
Byrd v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:13 am
It was a nightmare.I understand, mind you, the accused has a constitutional right under Faretta v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Lambert, No. 05-99011Denial of habeas relief from a conviction and death sentence for the first-degree murders of petitioner's wife and business partner is affirmed as: 1) a state court's holding that the trial court did not violate Faretta v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:45 am
In Faretta v. [read post]
