Search for: "Fielding v. Commissioner of Revenue"
Results 61 - 80
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
Journalism and regulation The Thunderer blog has an interesting piece on “Philanthro-journalism” – commenting on a piece in the Economist on the possibility of solving the problem of the decline in media revenues by philanthropy. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:52 am
De Londras also discusses the case of Zappone & Gilligan v Revenue Commissioners, in which a couple are seeking recognition of a gay marriage originating in Canada, which continues to await its Supreme Court hearing in Ireland (information on the KAL Case). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc., [2008] 3 SCR 265 At the outset, it is appropriate to refer to the words of Judson J. for this Court in Commissioner of Patents v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
On the same day the Investigatory Powers Tribunal handed down judgment on compensation in the case of News Group Newspapers v Commissioner of Police ([2016] UKIPTrib 14_176-H). [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
Administrative actions were taken by the IRS to address these violations: one revenue officer resigned in lieu of termination, one revenue officer received a 10 -day suspension, one contact representative received a 10-day suspension, and one contact representative was admonished. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
Bill Shaikin of the Los Angeles Times discusses how Frank McCourt could sue Major League Baseball and commissioner Bud Selig if Selig rejects a TV deal between the Dodgers and Fox. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
A further 32 complaints were received by the Information Commissioners Office (ICO), who informed Elia Bols that a fine of £100,000 would be issued. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm
Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue, 460 U.S. 575 (1983), all suffer from the same problem, from the government’s perspective – they don’t even mention Central Hudson. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design… [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 2:00 am
Indeed, one of the Supreme Court’s important cases upholding a congressional delegation of power to the Executive was Field v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:46 pm
By Stefan Passantino & Ben Keane It has been almost exactly 19 months since the Supreme Court handed down its controversial decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 11:12 am
Menard, Inc. v Commissioner (CA 7 3/10/2009)For an employer to deduct compensation paid, the amount must be reasonable. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Gittleman, Casenote, Home field advantage: determining the appropriate "turf” for Williams v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm
He also says that print is not dead yet, and that print continues to attract more advertising revenue than digital. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:34 pm
In the 1963 case of AFL v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
In Freeman v. [read post]
