Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 61 - 80 of 15,259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2017, 12:39 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued a significant ruling in Kahl v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
MGA Entertainment The post Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:43 am by Carolyn Elefant
Related posts: Three Lessons for Small Firms from Small Farms Resources for Solos and Small Firms Practicing Criminal Law Walmart v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
Even a public domain movie such Night of the Living Dead spawned a copyrightable slogan, "When there is no room in hell … the dead will walk the earth” (Dawn Associates v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 6:52 am
Whether a mark is registered in colour or in black is not regarded as a wholly negligible element in the eyes of consumers (Pico Food v OHIM, T‑623/11).There are also differences between the dominant elements of the marks at issue: the human figure in the earlier mark represents a man standing on one foot, whereas the lower limbs of the human figure in the mark applied for are not depicted. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 10:46 am
So now I am trying to figure out which one to go with. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:03 am
There has been some comment on this judgment (for example this post by suesspiciousminds), but clearly child care is not as 'sexy' as multi-million pound divorce cases...Hot on the heels of B (A Child) we had Prest v Petrodel, in which, to the surprise of some, Mrs Prest's appeal was unanimously allowed. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:34 pm by Marty Schwimmer
BATTLE FOAM v FOAM CORPS for laser cut foam for storing and carrying miniature toy figures. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:35 am by JAntonelli
For more information about your subpoena visit our […] The post Malibu Media v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:43 am by JAntonelli
For more information about your subpoena visit our […] The post Malibu Media LLC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 7:04 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court awarded the plaintiff $350,000 for emotional distress and $700,000 in punitive damages, plus $24,000 in lost wages.The case is Villalta v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has vacated the verdict, and the employer wins.The case is Stevens v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:00 am
- The figures released by the DWP seem so marvellous...A poisonous feud - The Court of Protection case Aidiniantz v Riley.A family divided by national borders - As in the case GM v DB.When a judge disagrees with precedent - As in KW & Ors v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council.Have a good weekend. [read post]