Search for: "Green v. District Court, Kentucky" Results 61 - 80 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2011, 11:32 am by admin
Hadden Argued Four Points Hadden essentially argued four points on appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky at Bowling Green. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 8:57 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 86435 (ED KY, Aug. 4, 2011), a Kentucky federal district court held that guards at a federal prison were protected by qualified immunity in both constitutional and RFRA damage claims alleging that they violated the religious rights of a Native American prisoner by removing a length of green string from his prayer feather. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:38 am by cdw
The Court therefore remanded the case to the district court. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am by Nabiha Syed
-       At Concurring Opinions, Thomas Crocker considers Justice Alito’s use of the term “privacy” in his opinion for the Court in Kentucky v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Oct. 21, 1988) (“the purpose of the Act is to provide for restitution for economic loss”).District of ColumbiaPersonal injuries are not mentioned in the list of remedies under the DC act. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:39 am by Antitrust Today
District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, who denied a motion to dismiss. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm by Pace Law School Library
Reese, Megan K., Kentucky courts have taken the “bite” out of dog-bite legislation: reforming the law to impose strict liability on dog owners. 47 U. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:01 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky 1980), which quoted from the Advisory Committee Note to Federal Rules of Evidence 801). [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:01 am
Bond Schoeneck & KingAn interesting case from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky addresses a particularly difficult religious accommodation question: at what point can an employer prohibit an employee from expressing religious views in the workplace? [read post]