Search for: "Gus Hurwitz"
Results 61 - 80
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2023, 8:35 am
Gus Hurwitz looks at the FTC's last-ditch appeal to stop the Microsoft-Activision merger. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:50 pm
Gus Hurwitz draws the short straw and sums up the second installment of the Elon Musk v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:16 am
ToTM posts by Dirk Auer, Alden Abbott, Gus Hurwitz, Gus again, and I enjoyed no monopoly on skepticism. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:37 am
If you need to catch up on the raft of antitrust lawsuits launched by the Biden administration, Gus Hurwitz has you covered. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 10:44 am
Here’s the initial participant list: Usman Ahmed // Georgetown Law (adjunct)/eBay David Ardia // University of North Carolina School of Law Rachel Aridor-Hershkovitz // Faculty of Law, Haifa University (PhD Student) Jane Bambauer // University of Arizona Law School Derek Bambauer // University of Arizona Law School Ann Bartow // Pace Law School Marc Blitz // Oklahoma City University School of Law Annemarie Bridy // University of Idaho College of Law Irene Calboli // Marquette University Law… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 5:48 am
Interested authors should submit pieces for consideration to Gus Hurwitz and Keith Fierro Benson. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:23 am
As Gus Hurwitz pointed out, the policy statement lacks legal force or precedential value. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 8:28 am
I had a few paragraphs on Meta-Within in my first roundup column; Gus Hurwitz covered it, as well. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:43 am
For discussion of the specifics, see the comments I filed with my ICLE colleagues Brian Albrecht, Dirk Auer, Gus Hurwitz, and Geoff Manne here, and additional comments by Gus Hurwitz and Geoff Manne here. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Green, Texas A&M University School of Law; Justin (Gus) Hurwitz, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School; Nazune Menka, Seattle University School of Law; Alan B. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
Adam Gus Aragón Deborah Bernini Kyle A. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:04 pm
In their comments to the FCC, Gus Hurwitz and Christopher Yoo conclude that the FCC itself seems to think that Title II regulation is a major question of “economic and political significance”: Rather, the fact that an agency feels it is necessary to ask whether its decisions raise major questions suggests that those questions may well be major. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 8:46 am
Separately, my International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE) colleague Gus Hurwitz recently published this piece in the George Mason Law Review, discussing the conditions under which the Court seemed “likely to close the door on administrative antitrust for reasons sounding in both administrative and antitrust law. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:17 am
I wrote about it here, and with Gus Hurwitz here. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:01 am
Heymann, William & Mary Law School Gus Hurwitz, University of Nebraska College of Law Daphne Keller, Stanford University Kathryn Kleiman, American University Washington College of Law Christopher Koopman, Utah State University Stacey M. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
” As the amicus brief from a group of internet-law scholars—including my International Center for Law & Economics colleagues Geoffrey Manne and Gus Hurwitz—put it: Section 230’s text should decide this case. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 8:49 am
Holbrook (Emory); Chris Holman (UMKC); Ryan Holte (SIU); Gus Hurwitz (Nebraska); Jay P. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:12 am
Rather than recapitulate the whole thing, I’ll point readers to Alden Abbott’s ToTM discussion earlier this week, another by Thom Lambert. an amicus brief by my International Center for Law & Economics colleagues Geoff Manne and Gus Hurwitz (plus a number of other law & economics scholars), and a thorough critique of the FTC’s case by Bruce Kobayashi (former director of the FTC’s Bureau of Economics) and Tim Muris (former FTC chairman). [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:54 am
Heymann (William & Mary) Justin (Gus) Hurwitz (Nebraska) Kate Klonick (St. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 11:44 am
Suffice it to say there is general agreement that, as Gus Hurwitz explains, the statement “is non-precedential and lacks the force of law. [read post]
