Search for: "Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises"
Results 61 - 72
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2017, 6:00 am
Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539, 550 (1985). [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am
Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539, 550 (1985). [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
New York: Harper & Row, 1972. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:45 am
Nation Enterprises. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
” Bluntschli writes, “However, this was a most unsatisfactory approach because it failed to take into account that the authorised publisher and the unauthorised reprinter have a different right only by virtue of their different relationship to the author, and that a monopoly granted to the former without consideration for the author, merely for the sake of the priority of the commercial enterprise, lacks any proper foundation. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
See Davis, 246 F.3d at 174 (use of plaintiff’s eyewear in a clothing advertisement not transformative because it was “worn as eye jewelry in the manner it was made to be worn”); Castle Rock Entm’t, 150 F.3d at 142-43 (quiz book called the “Seinfeld Aptitude Test” not transformative when its purpose was “to repackage [the television show] Seinfeld to entertain Seinfeld viewers”); Ringgold v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:38 am
On January 19, 2011, members of New York City’s theater community and human rights supporters gathered to mark the one month anniversary of Belarus’ contested presidential election. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:18 am
One of the earliest and most influential cases to enunciate this doctrine was Pope v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Does copyright conflict with free speech? [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Litvin, New York, New York, for amicus National Basketball Association. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
”6 In support, he cites Eldred v. [read post]
