Search for: "Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises" Results 61 - 72 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” Bluntschli writes, “However, this was a most unsatisfactory approach because it failed to take into account that the authorised publisher and the unauthorised reprinter have a different right only by virtue of their different relationship to the author, and that a monopoly granted to the former without consideration for the author, merely for the sake of the priority of the commercial enterprise, lacks any proper foundation. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:58 am by Terry Hart
See Davis, 246 F.3d at 174 (use of plaintiff’s eyewear in a clothing advertisement not transformative because it was “worn as eye jewelry in the manner it was made to be worn”); Castle Rock Entm’t, 150 F.3d at 142-43 (quiz book called the “Seinfeld Aptitude Test” not transformative when its purpose was “to repackage [the television show] Seinfeld to entertain Seinfeld viewers”); Ringgold v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:38 am by Terry Hart
On January 19, 2011, members of New York City’s theater community and human rights supporters gathered to mark the one month anniversary of Belarus’ contested presidential election. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:18 am by Terry Hart
One of the earliest and most influential cases to enunciate this doctrine was Pope v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Litvin, New York, New York, for amicus National Basketball Association. [read post]