Search for: "Harris v. Younger"
Results 61 - 80
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2010, 6:02 am
In Harris v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm
Judge Morgan was supposedly younger when he took his seat (at least according to some exhaustive research on my part). [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm
Judge Morgan was supposedly younger when he took his seat (at least according to some exhaustive research on my part). [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 10:14 am
Tokyo lastly argued the District Court erred in its decision to abstain under the doctrine established in Younger v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
Gore, 517 U.S. 559 (1996), Cooper Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
Briefly: As Lyle Denniston reports at this blog, yesterday the Court announced that Scott Harris, the Court’s legal counsel, will succeed William Suter as the Clerk of Court on September 1. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 7:10 pm
Jonathan R. 22-240Issues: (1) Whether federal courts must abstain from interfering with state-court child welfare proceedings under Younger v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am
Davis and Helvering v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
On Tuesday, Mr Justice Newey, giving judgment in the High Court, England and Wales, thought not in Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v Harris. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
Harris, 133 S.Ct. 1050 (2013) (quoting Texas v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 5:54 am
Carlin, and Sabastian V. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). 08a0010p.06 Uhl v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm
Doguet 23-291Issue: Whether Younger v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:33 am
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 3:22 pm
v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 6:11 am
The Supreme Court treated the issue less than transparently in Campbell v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:53 am
The district court dismissed the case, relying on a Supreme Court decision, Younger v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0254p.06 2007/07/10 Hartman v. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm
Fancourt J criticised Prince Harry’s individual claim in the phone hacking litigation against News Group Newspapers, stating that “the claim at times resembles more an entrenched front in a campaign between two obdurate but well-resourced armies than a claim for misuse of private information” and is “starting to absorb more than an appropriate share of the court’s resources” [9]. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am
While dismissing the complaint pursuant to Younger v. [read post]
