Search for: "Hodges v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 670
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm by Roger Parloff
A judge today removed a county official from office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, the hoary post-Civil War provision that bars certain people from holding office if they have “engaged in insurrection” against the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 12:28 pm by Simmons & Schiavo, LLP
Twelve years later in 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
He also expressly joined Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion analogizing homosexual conduct to bigamy, incest, and prostitution.In both United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
Hodges, the 2015 ruling striking down state laws barring same-sex marriage. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
Kansas (1887) and was the lone dissenter in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Zoe Stern
Hodges, which protects the right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:23 am by David Oscar Markus
Hodges, the 2015 decision that recognized the right to same-sex marriage, or of organizations trying to revisit Griswold v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:01 pm by Ilya Somin
Hodges (2015) (thereby striking down laws banning same-sex marriage). [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:58 am
Hodges found that right- hiding somewhere in the shadows of the fourteenth amendment. [read post]
Eight months before the 2016 presidential election, the President of the United States nominated a respected jurist to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:08 pm by Karis Stephen
Hodges, which protects the right to gay marriage. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]